Pre-operative and post-operative recommendations to surgical wound care interventions: A systematic meta-review of Cochrane reviews

Authors

Brigid M. Gillespie, Griffith University, Australia; Gold Coast University Hospital, Gold Coast Health, Gold Coast, Australia; School of Nursing and Midwifery, Royal College of Surgeons, Dublin, IrelandFollow
Rachel M. Walker, Griffith University, Australia; Princess Alexandra Hospital, Metro South Health, Brisbane, AustraliaFollow
Elizabeth Catherine McInnes, Nursing Research Institute, St Vincent’s Health Australia Sydney, St Vincent’s Hospital Melbourne; Australian Catholic University, AustraliaFollow
Zena Moore, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Royal College of Surgeons, Dublin, Ireland; Skin Wounds and Trauma Research Centre, Royal College of Surgeons, United Kingdom; Monash University, Melbourne, Australia; Lida Institute, Shanghai, ChinaFollow
Anne Eskes, Department of Surgery, UMC and University of Amsterdam, The NetherlandsFollow
Tom O'Connor, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Royal College of Surgeons, Dublin, Ireland; Skin Wounds and Trauma Research Centre, Royal College of Surgeons, United Kingdom; Monash University, Melbourne, Australia; Lida Institute, Shanghai, ChinaFollow
Emma Harbeck PhD B Psyche (Hons), Griffith University, AustraliaFollow
Codi White, Griffith University, AustraliaFollow
Ian Scott, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Metro South Health, Brisbane, AustraliaFollow
Hester Vermeulen, IQ Healthcare, Radboud Institute of Health Sciences, Scientific Center for Quality of Healthcare, Tthe NetherlandsFollow
Wendy P. Chaboyer, Griffith University, AustraliaFollow

Abstract

Background: The increasing numbers of surgeries involving high risk, multimorbid patients, coupled with inconsistencies in the practice of perioperative surgical wound care, increases patients’ risk of surgical site infection and other wound complications.

Objectives: To synthesise and evaluate the recommendations for nursing practice and research from published systematic reviews in the Cochrane Library on nurse-led pre-operative prophylaxis and post-operative surgical wound care interventions used or initiated by nurses.

Design: Meta-review, guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines.

Data sources: The Cochrane Library database.

Review methods: All Cochrane Systematic Reviews were eligible. Two reviewers independently selected the reviews and extracted data. One reviewer appraised the methodological quality of the included reviews using A MeaSurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews 2 (AMSTAR 2) checklist. A second reviewer independently verified these appraisals. The review protocol was registered with the Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews.

Results: Twenty-two Cochrane reviews met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 11 reviews focused on pre-operative interventions to prevent infection, while 12 focused on post-operative interventions (one review assessed both pre-and post-operative interventions). Across all reviews, 14 (63.6%) made at least one recommendation to undertake a specific practice, while two reviews (9.1%) made at least one specific recommendation not to undertake a practice. In relation to recommendations for further research, insufficient sample size was the most predominant methodological issue (12/22) identified across reviews.

Conclusions: The limited number of recommendations for pre- and postoperative interventions reflects the paucity of high-quality evidence, suggesting a need for rigorous trials to address these evidence gaps in fundamentals of nursing care.

Recommended Citation

Gillespie, Brigid M.; Walker, Rachel M.; McInnes, Elizabeth Catherine; Moore, Zena; Eskes, Anne; O'Connor, Tom; Harbeck, Emma PhD B Psyche (Hons); White, Codi; Scott, Ian; Vermeulen, Hester; and P. Chaboyer, Wendy (2021) "Pre-operative and post-operative recommendations to surgical wound care interventions: A systematic meta-review of Cochrane reviews," Journal of Perioperative Nursing: Vol. 34 : Iss. 4 , Article 4.
Available at: https://doi.org/10.26550/2209-1092.1160

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.